|
Complex Thinker
Creates understanding through analysis and synthesis of research
|
Skilled Information Processor
Accurately assesses the value of information
|
Comments
|
|
|
4 Exceeds Expectations- WOW
- Clear, focused thesis lays out a well-focused yet complex argument (highly debatable but with strong evidence).
- In-depth analysis proves the thesis.
- Each point of essay is necessary to and deepens, a complex, focused argument.
- Essay demonstrates synthesis of the information and ideas at hand, creating a unified, well-supported argument.
|
4 Exceeds Expectations--WOW
- In-depth understanding of information seen by clear descriptions and direct reference.
- Information is concise and not repetitive.
- Strong supporting evidence advances and clarifies the argument.
- Factual information is detailed and clearly explained in all its complexity.
- Strategically chooses to quote, paraphrase and summarize with great effect.
- Sources are highly credible and varied.
|
|
|
3 Meets Expectations
§ Essay contains a focused thesis that is both arguable and defendable.
- Analysis supports thesis.
- Each point is necessary to the argument being made.
|
3 Meets Expectations
· Essay shows clear understanding as seen by clear descriptions and direct reference.
- Information is focused on important issues.
- All evidence is used to prove the thesis.
- Factual information is substantially correct.
- Sources are credible and varied.
- Effectively quotes, paraphrases and summarizes.
- Sources are correctly cited using MLA format (in-text and Works Consulted).
|
|
2 Approaches Expectations
- Identifiable thesis, but argument is not strong (either not very arguable or not very defendable).
- Analysis is limited or weak, but supports thesis.
- Essay has good ideas but they do not come together into a cohesive argument.
|
2 Approaches Expectations
- Essay shows understanding of the topic, though complex issues are simplified.
- Some unnecessary factual information.
- Supporting evidence present, but might not advance argument.
- Factual errors weaken the essay.
- Sources lack credibility for one or more reasons, and/or sources are not varied.
- Decisions about when to quote, paraphrase and summarize could be improved.
- Some minor or infrequent errors in MLA formatting.
|
|
|
1 Does Not Meet Expectations
- Thesis is not arguable or defendable.
- Analysis is lacking.
- Writer does not craft an argument.
|
1 Does Not Meet Expectations
- Essay does not demonstrate understanding of factual information.
- Presentation of complex issues is confusing.
- Little or no supporting evidence present.
- Writer has either not read or not absorbed the material.
- Does not cite sources.
- Does not use enough source material; does not quote, paraphrase or summarize source material.
- Significant errors in MLA formatting mar essay.
|
|
|
Effective Communicator
Content/structure: Expresses ideas clearly
|
Effective Communicator
Writing Skills: Creates Quality Product
|
Comments
|
|
4 Exceeds Expectations--WOW
- Intro. captures the reader’s attention and connects to the thesis.
- Conclusion flows naturally from the evidence and argument provided.
- Argument is organized to highlight main ideas and builds in a logical, powerful way.
- Coherent transitions tie paragraphs to each other and thesis.
- There is a logical flow within paragraphs.
|
4 Exceeds Expectations--WOW
The writer conveys conviction and enthusiasm for topic. One or more of these may be present:
- Sentences are well-built with a strong and varied structure.
- Formal language demonstrates writer’s knowledge,
- Writer’s voice is blended with appropriate material from sources.
- Powerful well-chosen and accurate word choice enhances argument.
- Writing has a smooth flow and rhythm.
- Writer uses conventions for stylistic effect.
|
|
3 Meets Expectations
- Paper contains an introduction that forecasts the content.
- Conclusion pulls argument together.
- The argument is the focus of the essay.
- There are transitions between paragraphs.
- Every paragraph is correctly structured.
|
3 Meets Expectations
- Sentences are well-constructed.
- Formal language is consistent throughout.
- Writer’s voice is evident.
- Word choice and usage are consistently correct.
- Writing is clear.
- Spelling, grammar, and punctuation are generally correct with few errors to distract the reader.
|
2 Approaches Expectations
- The intro needs revision.
- Conclusion needs revision.
- Argument is not the focus of the essay.
- Transitions may be weak or missing.
- Paragraph structure is disorganized, repetitive, or confusing.
|
2 Approaches Expectations
- Writing is basically clear, but sentences may have awkward construction and little variety.
- Language may be unsophisticated or lack authority; use of personal pronouns (i.e., he, she, it, they) weakens argument.
- Writer’s voice is inconsistently presented, or is too dependent on source material.
- Spelling, grammatical, and/or punctuation errors need to be addressed because they distract the reader.
|
|
1 Does Not Meet Expectations
- Essay has no logical flow.
- Writing has listed facts in random fashion.
|
1 Does Not Meet Expectations
- Writing appears indifferent to both topic and audience.
- Paper is over-paraphrased and/or over-quoted.
- Tone may be flat or inappropriate.
- Numerous errors make reading this paper very difficult.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|